🔗 Share this article

The number of guaranteed positions for Indigenous council members on NZ local authorities will be slashed by over 50%, following a controversial legislative amendment that forced municipal councils to submit the future of hard-earned Indigenous wards to a popular referendum.

Historical Context on Indigenous Representation

Indigenous electoral districts, which can include one or more councillors based on local population numbers, were established in 2001 to provide Māori electors the choice to vote for a guaranteed Indigenous council member in municipal and provincial governments. Originally, local governments could only establish a Indigenous seat by initially submitting it to a community referendum in their area. Local populations frequently devoted considerable time generating local support and pushing their local governments to create Indigenous representation.

Legislative Shifts and Government Actions

To address this concern, the former administration allowed local councils to establish a Māori ward without first requiring them to subject it to a public vote.

But in 2024, the current administration overturned the policy, stating local residents should decide whether to introduce Indigenous representation.

Voting Outcomes

The coalition’s law change required local authorities that had established a electoral district under the previous policy to conduct decisive public votes concurrently with the municipal polls, which concluded on October 11. Out of 42 local governments participating in the public vote, 17 voted to retain their wards, and twenty-five to disestablish theirs – revealing numerous areas against guaranteed Māori representation.

The results represented “a crucial move in reinstating local democratic control.”

Critics however have criticised the new policy as “discriminatory” and “anti-Māori”. Since taking office, the coalition government has ushered in extensive reversals to measures designed to enhance Māori health, wellbeing and representation. Officials has stated it aims to terminate “race-based” policies, and says it is committed to enhancing results for Indigenous people and all New Zealanders.

Geographical Splits

The results of the public votes were divided down urban-rural lines – most cities mandated to hold referendums supported Māori wards, while countryside areas leaned strongly towards removing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Māori wards that had only just come in – they’re only just starting to find their footing.”

Voter Turnout and Criticism

The recent municipal polls registered the smallest electoral participation in 36 years, with less than a third of eligible voters casting a vote, leading to demands for reform.

This approach had been “a farce”.

Differential Standards

Local governments are able to create different electoral districts – including rural wards – without first requiring a public vote. The disparate requirements applied to Māori wards suggested the government was singling out Indigenous inclusion.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Many communities have expressed strong opposition.”

This remark concerned the 17 regions that chose to keep their wards.